Mesothelioma is a form of cancer, almost always caused by previous exposure to asbestos. In
this disease, malignant (cancerous) cells develop in the mesothelium, a protective lining
that covers most of the body's internal organs. Its most common site is the pleura (outer
lining of the lungs and chest cavity), but it may also occur in the peritoneum (the lining
of the abdominal cavity) or the pericardium (a sac that surrounds the heart).
Most people who develop mesothelioma have worked on jobs where they inhaled asbestos
particles, or have been exposed to asbestos dust and fibre in other ways, such as by washing
the clothes of a family member who worked with asbestos, or by home renovation using
asbestos cement products.
Signs and symptoms
Symptoms of mesothelioma may not appear until 20 to 50 years after exposure to asbestos.
Shortness of breath, cough, and pain in the chest due to an accumulation of fluid in the
pleural space are often symptoms of pleural mesothelioma.
Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma include weight loss and cachexia, abdominal swelling and
pain due to ascites (a buildup of fluid in the abdominal cavity). Other symptoms of
peritoneal mesothelioma may include bowel obstruction, blood clotting abnormalities, anemia,
and fever. If the cancer has spread beyond the mesothelium to other parts of the body,
symptoms may include pain, trouble swallowing, or swelling of the neck or face.
These symptoms may be caused by mesothelioma or by other, less serious conditions.
Diagnosis
Diagnosing mesothelioma is often difficult, because the symptoms are similar to those of a
number of other conditions. Diagnosis begins with a review of the patient's medical history.
A history of exposure to asbestos may increase clinical suspicion for mesothelioma. A
physical examination is performed, followed by chest X-ray and often lung function tests.
The X-ray may reveal pleural thickening commonly seen after asbestos exposure and increases
suspicion of mesothelioma. A CT (or CAT) scan or an MRI is usually performed. If a large
amount of fluid is present, abnormal cells may be detected by cytology if this fluid is
aspirated with a syringe. For pleural fluid this is done by a pleural tap or chest drain, in
ascites with an paracentesis or ascitic drain and in a pericardial effusion with
pericardiocentesis. While absence of malignant cells on cytology does not completely exclude
mesothelioma, it makes it much more unlikely, especially if an alternative diagnosis can be
made (e.g. tuberculosis, heart failure).
If cytology is positive or a plaque is regarded as suspicious, a biopsy is needed to confirm
a diagnosis of mesothelioma. A doctor removes a sample of tissue for examination under a
microscope by a histopathologist. A biopsy may be done in different ways, depending on where
the abnormal area is located. If the cancer is in the chest, the doctor may perform a
thoracoscopy. In this procedure, the doctor makes a small cut through the chest wall and
puts a thin, lighted tube called a thoracoscope into the chest between two ribs.
Thoracoscopy allows the doctor to look inside the chest and obtain tissue samples.
If the cancer is in the abdomen, the doctor may perform a laparoscopy. To obtain tissue for
examination, the doctor makes a small opening in the abdomen and inserts a special
instrument into the abdominal cavity. If these procedures do not yield enough tissue, more
extensive diagnostic surgery may be necessary.
Screening
There is no universally agreed protocol for screening people who have been exposed to
asbestos. However some research indicates that the serum osteopontin level might be useful
in screening asbestos-exposed people for mesothelioma. The level of soluble
mesothelin-related protein is elevated in the serum of about 75% of patients at diagnosis
and it has been suggested that it may be useful for screening
Staging
Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the doctor may need to assess the stage to help plan
treatment.
Mesothelioma is described as localized if the cancer is found only on the membrane surface
where it originated. It is classified as advanced if it has spread beyond the original
membrane surface to other parts of the body, such as the lymph nodes, lungs, chest wall, or
abdominal organs.
Pathophysiology
The mesothelium consists of a single layer of flattened to cuboidal cells forming the
epithelial lining of the serous cavities of the body including the peritoneal, pericardial
and pleural cavities. Deposition of asbestos fibres in the parenchyma of the lung may result
in the penetration of the visceral pleura from where the fibre can then be carried to the
pleural surface, thus leading to the development of malignant mesothelial plaques. The
processes leading to the development of peritoneal mesothelioma remain unresolved, although
it has been proposed that asbestos fibres from the lung are transported to the abdomen and
associated organs via the lymphatic system. Additionally, asbestos fibres may be deposited
in the gut after ingestion of sputum contaminated with asbestos fibres.
Pleural contamination with asbestos or other mineral fibres has been shown to cause cancer.
Long thin asbestos fibers (blue asbestos, amphibole fibers) are more potent carcinogens than
"feathery fibers" (chrysotile or white asbestos fibers)[2]. However, there is now evidence
that smaller particles may be more dangerous than the larger fibers.[3][4] They remain
suspended in the air where they can be inhaled, and may penetrate more easily and deeper
into the lungs. "We probably will find out a lot more about the health aspects of asbestos
from [the World Trade Center attack], unfortunately," said Dr. Alan Fein, chief of pulmonary
and critical-care medicine at North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System. Dr. Fein has
treated several patients for "World Trade Center syndrome" or respiratory ailments from
brief exposures of only a day or two near the collapsed buildings.[5]
Mesothelioma development in rats has been demonstrated following intra-pleural inoculation
of phosphorylated chrysotile fibres. It has been suggested that in humans, transport of
fibres to the pleura is critical to the pathogenesis of mesothelioma. This is supported by
the observed recruitment of significant numbers of macrophages and other cells of the immune
system to localised lesions of accumulated asbestos fibres in the pleural and peritoneal
cavities of rats. These lesions continued to attract and accumulate macrophages as the
disease progressed, and cellular changes within the lesion culminated in a morphologically
malignant tumour. Experimental evidence suggests that asbestos acts as a complete carcinogen
with the development of mesothelioma occurring in sequential stages of initiation and
promotion. The molecular mechanisms underlying the malignant transformation of normal
mesothelial cells by asbestos fibres remain unclear despite the demonstration of its
oncogenic capabilities. However, complete in vitro transformation of normal human
mesothelial cells to malignant phenotype following exposure to asbestos fibres has not yet
been achieved. In general, asbestos fibres are thought to act through direct physical
interactions with the cells of the mesothelium in conjunction with indirect effects
following interaction with inflammatory cells such as macrophages. Analysis of the
interactions between asbestos fibres and DNA has shown that phagocytosed fibres are able to
make contact with chromosomes, often adhering to the chromatin fibres or becoming entangled
within the chromosome. This contact between the asbestos fibre and the chromosomes or
structural proteins of the spindle apparatus can induce complex abnormalities. The most
common abnormality is monosomy of chromosome 22. Other frequent abnormalities include
structural rearrangement of 1p, 3p, 9p and 6q chromosome arms. Common gene abnormalities in
mesothelioma cell lines include deletion of the tumor suppressor genes:
* Neurofibromatosis type 2 at 22q12
* P16INK4A
* P14ARF
Asbestos has also been shown to mediate the entry of foreign DNA into target cells.
Incorporation of this foreign DNA may lead to mutations and oncogenesis by several possible
mechanisms:
* Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes
* Activation of oncogenes
* Activation of proto-oncogenes due to incorporation of foreign DNA containing a
promoter region
* Activation of DNA repair enzymes, which may be prone to error
* Activation of telomerase
* Prevention of apoptosis
Asbestos fibres have been shown to alter the function and secretory properties of
macrophages, ultimately creating conditions which favour the development of mesothelioma.
Following asbestos phagocytosis, macrophages generate increased amounts of hydroxyl
radicals, which are normal by-products of cellular anaerobic metabolism. However, these free
radicals are also known clastogenic and membrane-active agents thought to promote asbestos
carcinogenicity. These oxidants can participate in the oncogenic process by directly and
indirectly interacting with DNA, modifying membrane-associated cellular events, including
oncogene activation and perturbation of cellular antioxidant defences. Asbestos may also
possess immunosuppressive properties. For example, chrysotile fibres have been shown to
depress the in vitro proliferation of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood
lymphocytes, suppress natural killer cell lysis and significantly reduce
lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cell viability and recovery. Furthermore, genetic
alterations in asbestos-activated macrophages may result in the release of potent
mesothelial cell mitogens such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming
growth factor-β (TGF-β) which in turn, may induce the chronic stimulation and proliferation
of mesothelial cells after injury by asbestos fibres.
Risk factors
Working with asbestos is the major risk factor for mesothelioma. A history of asbestos
exposure exists in almost all cases. However, mesothelioma has been reported in some
individuals without any known exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos is the name of a group of minerals that occur naturally as masses of strong,
flexible fibers that can be separated into thin threads and woven. Asbestos has been widely
used in many industrial products, including cement, brake linings, roof shingles, flooring
products, textiles, and insulation. If tiny asbestos particles float in the air, especially
during the manufacturing process, they may be inhaled or swallowed, and can cause serious
health problems. In addition to mesothelioma, exposure to asbestos increases the risk of
lung cancer, asbestosis (a noncancerous, chronic lung ailment), and other cancers, such as
those of the larynx and kidney.
The combination of smoking and asbestos exposure significantly increases a person's risk of
developing cancer of the airways (lung cancer, bronchial carcinoma). The Kent brand of
cigarettes used asbestos in its filters for the first few years of production in the 1950s
and some cases of mesothelioma have resulted. Smoking current cigarettes does not appear to
increase the risk of mesothelioma.
Some studies suggest that simian virus 40 (SV40) may act as a cofactor in the development of
mesothelioma
Exposure
Asbestos has been mined and used commercially since the late 1800s. Its use greatly
increased during World War II. Since the early 1940s, millions of American workers have been
exposed to asbestos dust. Initially, the risks associated with asbestos exposure were not
publicly known. However, an increased risk of developing mesothelioma was later found among
shipyard workers, people who work in asbestos mines and mills, producers of asbestos
products, workers in the heating and construction industries, and other tradespeople. Today,
the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets limits for acceptable
levels of asbestos exposure in the workplace, and created guidelines for engineering
controls and respirators, protective clothing, exposure monitoring, hygiene facilities and
practices, warning signs, labeling, recordkeeping, and medical exams. By contrast, the
British Government's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) states formally that any threshold
for mesothelioma must be at a very low level and it is widely agreed that if any such
threshold does exists at all, then it cannot currently be quantified. For practical
purposes, therefore, HSE does not assume that any such threshold exists. People who work
with asbestos wear personal protective equipment to lower their risk of exposure.
Exposure to asbestos fibres has been recognised as an occupational health hazard since the
early 1900s. Several epidemiological studies have associated exposure to asbestos with the
development of lesions such as asbestos bodies in the sputum, pleural plaques, diffuse
pleural thickening, asbestosis, carcinoma of the lung and larynx, gastrointestinal tumours,
and diffuse mesothelioma of the pleura and peritoneum.
The documented presence of asbestos fibres in water supplies and food products has fostered
concerns about the possible impact of long-term and, as yet, unknown exposure of the general
population to these fibres. Although many authorities consider brief or transient exposure
to asbestos fibres as inconsequential and an unlikely risk factor, some epidemiologists
claim that there is no risk threshold. Cases of mesothelioma have been found in people whose
only exposure was breathing the air through ventilation systems. Other cases had very
minimal (3 months or less) direct exposure.
Commercial asbestos mining at Wittenoom, Western Australia, occurred between 1945 and 1966.
A cohort study of miners employed at the mine reported that while no deaths occurred within
the first 10 years after crocidolite exposure, 85 deaths attributable to mesothelioma had
occurred by 1985. It is predicted that the number of cases within this study group will
reach in excess of 700 by the year 2020. By 1994, 539 reported deaths due to mesothelioma
had been reported in Western Australia.
Family members and others living with asbestos workers have an increased risk of developing
mesothelioma, and possibly other asbestos related diseases. This risk may be the result of
exposure to asbestos dust brought home on the clothing and hair of asbestos workers. To
reduce the chance of exposing family members to asbestos fibres, asbestos workers are
usually required to shower and change their clothing before leaving the workplace.
Treatment
Treatment of MM using conventional therapies has not proved successful and patients have a
median survival time of 6 - 12 months after presentation. The clinical behaviour of the
malignancy is affected by several factors including the continuous mesothelial surface of
the pleural cavity which favours local metastasis via exfoliated cells, invasion to
underlying tissue and other organs within the pleural cavity, and the extremely long latency
period between asbestos exposure and development of the disease
Surgery
Surgery, either by itself or used in combination with pre- and post-operative adjuvant
therapies has proved disappointing with a 5 year survival rate of less than 10%. A
pleurectomy/decortication is the most common surgery, in which the lining of the chest is
removed. Less common is an extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), in which the lung, lining of
the inside of the chest, the hemi-diaphragm and the pericardium are removed.
Radiation
Although the tumor is highly resistant to radiotherapy, these regimens are sometimes used to
relieve symptoms arising from tumor growth, such as obstruction of a major blood vessel.
Radiotherapy is commonly applied to the sites of chest drain insertion, in order to prevent
growth of the tumor along the track in the chest wall.
Immunotherapy
Treatment regimens involving immunotherapy have yielded variable results. For example,
intrapleural inoculation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in an attempt to boost the immune
response, was found to be of no benefit to the patient (while it may benefit patients with
bladder cancer). Mesothelioma cells proved susceptible to in vitro lysis by LAK cells
following activation by interleukin-2 (IL-2), but patients undergoing this particular
therapy experienced major side effects. Indeed, this trial was suspended in view of the
unacceptably high levels of IL-2 toxicity and the severity of side effects such as fever and
cachexia. Nonetheless, other trials involving interferon alpha have proved more encouraging
with 20% of patients experiencing a greater than 50% reduction in tumor mass combined with
minimal side effects.
Heated Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
A procedure known as heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was developed by
Paul Sugarbaker at the Washington Cancer Institute[10]. The surgeon removes as much of the
tumor as possible followed by the direct administration of a chemotherapy agent, heated to
between 40 and 48°C, in the abdomen. The fluid is perfused for 60 to 120 minutes and then
drained.
This technique permits the administration of high concentrations of selected drugs into the
abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Heating the chemotherapy treatment increases the penetration
of the drugs into tissues. Also, heating itself damages the malignant cells more than the
normal cells.
No comments:
Post a Comment